Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php(441) : eval()'d code on line 2

Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2968

Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php(576) : eval()'d code on line 11

Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php(576) : eval()'d code on line 11

Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php(441) : eval()'d code on line 2

Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php(576) : eval()'d code on line 11

Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php(576) : eval()'d code on line 11

Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php(576) : eval()'d code on line 11

Warning: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in ..../showthread.php(2406) : eval()'d code on line 27
M50 conversion
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: M50 conversion

                  
   
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Frederick, MD
    Posts
    236

    M50 conversion

    Just a heads up for anyone with an e36 considering doing an M50 conversion: DDOOO IIITTTT!!! It was the best $330 + 6 hours of labor (2 spent BS'ing) that I've spent on the car so far. I did lose some torque, but the gains on the top half of the RPM range really made up for it. I have an S52 M roadster. From about 3,500 RPM's up to 7k, the power really comes alive now. I used to be a torque monster (just Dinan tune and fan delete) but after about 5,000 rpms, the car would fall flat. Now, on the other hand, I can really pull through the gears and drive it like it should be driven. Why didn't BMW do this in the first place?


    Some observations:

    1) Take your time with this one. There's a lot of hoses and it gets confusing. If you want to do it, PM me first and I can give you a hand for the price of a few beers. I think having experience on this job will make it go drastically faster. Instead of 6 hours, I bet I can do it in 2 now if I rush or 3 if I do it nice and slow.
    2) I have a slight stutter as I accelerate. It started off with two separate stutters: one at 3k and one at 6k. As the ECU has been learning, however, I'm now down to one stutter at 5,500 and that seems to be going away. I expect the power to be smooth after about 500 or so miles.
    3) The car is actually more drivable now. A little less torque and a little more high end power can really make a difference. Now I don't feel like I'm going to run into the guy in front of me in town and on the highway I can zip right around any slow-moving left-lane bandits without downshifting.
    4) It's slightly more loud. I especially notice this when the engine is under light load at 2,500 rpms. The drone at that rpm is far more significant than before but most other times it's the same as before the swap.


    All in all, I hope to dyno soon. When I do, I'll post up the numbers for you guys to drool over.


    What traction control?

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Germantown, MD
    Posts
    83
    Good feedback man, I talked to you a little during your install at last Saturday's DIY. When I get my kit together, it will be good to have someone to go to for help.

  3. #3
    Do I understand this conversion? Do you replace the intake plenum, ECU, and fuel rail of a S52 motor to the M50 components? This is to make more horsepower at the cost of some torque?
    Bob Hopkins
    M3 1997 Black "Vader"
    911 1986 Red "Baron"

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Germantown, MD
    Posts
    83
    only the intake plenum/manifold and the needed hoses are replaced not the fuel rail or ecu. the m50 manifold has bigger air passages which will generate more top end power.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Frederick, MD
    Posts
    236
    Quote Originally Posted by martinj View Post
    only the intake plenum/manifold and the needed hoses are replaced not the fuel rail or ecu. the m50 manifold has bigger air passages which will generate more top end power.
    exactly.

    The hoses are added because the M50 manifold is OBDI and I'm putting it on an OBDII car. There's more vacuum lines in the OBDII car that need to be connected to the manifold.

    We didn't even have to disconnect the fuel rail much less touch the ECU!


    What traction control?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. December DIY: M50 conversion too much?
    By gbauer in forum Do It Yourself Tech Sessions
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-03-2008, 03:43 PM
  2. 2003 325 xenon conversion
    By Superide in forum Do It Yourself
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-26-2006, 12:50 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •